From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: GNU Pascal (gpc) 2.1 released
Date:	Thu, 23 May 2002 23:22:30 +0100
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<3CED6BA6.48D4D0FE@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020523191611 DOT 3394B-100000 AT is> <3CED528D DOT 7DCF9660 AT yahoo DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modem-4.scandium.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk 1022192622 25294 62.136.20.4 (23 May 2002 22:23:42 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	23 May 2002 22:23:42 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

CBFalconer wrote:
[snip
> > [2] c:\djgpp>list manifest\gcc2953b.mft manifest\gpp2953b.mft
> > [2] c:\djgpp>rm -f -v @manifest/gpp2953.mft

Er, don't you mean:

    rm -f -v @manifest/gpp2953b.mft

It appears that you won't get an error if you use '@' on a non-existent file.
E.g.:

    bash-2.04$ ls -l foo
    c:/djgpp/bin/ls: foo: No such file or directory (ENOENT)
    bash-2.04$ rm -fv @foo

Regards,

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -