From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: GNU Pascal (gpc) 2.1 released
Date:	Thu, 23 May 2002 18:32:54 +0100
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<3CED27C6.2AA31B64@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020523154818 DOT 906A-100000 AT is> <3CED102B DOT DAD87482 AT yahoo DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modem-164.iodine.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news7.svr.pol.co.uk 1022175302 15011 62.136.44.164 (23 May 2002 17:35:02 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	23 May 2002 17:35:02 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

CBFalconer wrote:
[snip]
> I checked that the appropriate .mft files existed, and that they
> contained suitable file lists, yet issuing the rm -f @XXX command
> did NOT delete the files.  I have also checked that rm IS running
> the rm in the DJGPP\BIN directory.  I have an alias for rm in the
> form "*rm -i", which should not affect anything since the docs say
> -f defeats an earlier -i, and I also attempted totally defeating
> the alias.  Just in case 4dos had anything to do with it I tried
> executing the lines through bash, with no change.

What happens if you use the '-v' (verbose) option? E.g.:

    rm -fv @XXX

Does 'rm' display anything?

Regards,

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -