Message-ID:	<3CE8B6F5.4337A883@acm.org>
From:	Eric Sosman <esosman AT acm DOT org>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: enum
References:	<20020520050514 DOT 50800 DOT qmail AT web11302 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Lines:	25
Date:	Mon, 20 May 2002 13:41:48 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	12.91.2.15
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace:	bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1021902108 12.91.2.15 (Mon, 20 May 2002 13:41:48 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 20 May 2002 13:41:48 GMT
Organization:	AT&T Worldnet
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Pedro Izecksohn wrote:
> 
>    Wouldn't be great if it was possible to compile the code
> bellow ? I know the compiler's problem with it, but what is
> the logical problem ? Hasn't English some words that they
> have differents meanings in different phrases ?
> 
> #define something enum something
> something {
> a,b,c,d,e };
> 
> #define otherthing enum otherthing
> otherthing {
> a,s,d,f,g };
> [...]

    If this were permitted, what output should
`printf ("d = %d\n", d);' produce?  `d' means 3
in the "something" context, but 2 if regarded as
an "otherthing;" which context is correct for the
printf() call?

-- 
Eric Sosman
esosman AT acm DOT org

- Raw text -