X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Authentication-Warning:	kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date:	Thu, 2 May 2002 09:34:32 -0500
From:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: LFN on pure DOS
Message-ID:	<20020502143432.GA3542@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References:	<c21a43ff DOT 0204241352 DOT 74858db3 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <20020425010620 DOT GA17090 AT taniwha DOT org> <1019895346 DOT 635577 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <20020430132704 DOT GA1671 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <aam6v9$60m$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <20020501202354 DOT GB3136 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <aaqhb8$ksk$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<aaqhb8$ksk$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.27i
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g42EYhL26164
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu|2002.05.02, Martin Strömberg (work) wrote:

[snip]

These modifications greatly simplified the task of working with the TSR
on my machine.  The features I stripped can wait until I know what I'm
doing.

BTW, who really *needs* a DOS LFN TSR in this day and age?  AFAICT the
Windoze and NT crowd already have LFN support, and on Unix or Linux it's
a moot point anyway.  Doesn't that just leave the pure DOS users?

- Raw text -