| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:23:56 +0300 |
| From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
| To: | "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT bigfoot DOT com> |
| Message-Id: | <7458-Sun21Apr2002182355+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
| X-Mailer: | emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
| CC: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <a9uahn$6ao8i$1@ID-79865.news.dfncis.de> (alexvn@bigfoot.com) |
| Subject: | Re: uclock_t & gcc 3.0.4 on Windows-2000 |
| References: | <a9uahn$6ao8i$1 AT ID-79865 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT bigfoot DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:17:15 +0200
>
> start_uclock_ = 35292
> end_uclock_ = 35306
> start_uclock_ = -29321
> end_uclock_ = -29307
> Assertion failed at xxx.h line 34: start_uclock_ >= 0
> Exiting due to signal SIGABRT
> Raised at eip=00007c8e
> eax=000bf9ec ebx=00000120 ecx=00000000 edx=00000000 esi=00000054 edi=0003fb60
> ebp=000bfa98 esp=000bf9e8 program=D:\_T02_P~1\a.exe
> cs: sel=01f7 base=01e80000 limit=000cffff
> ds: sel=01ff base=01e80000 limit=000cffff
> es: sel=01ff base=01e80000 limit=000cffff
> fs: sel=01cf base=00012150 limit=0000ffff
> gs: sel=020f base=00000000 limit=0010ffff
> ss: sel=01ff base=01e80000 limit=000cffff
> App stack: [000bfb60..0003fb60] Exceptn stack: [0003fabc..0003db7c]
>
> Call frame traceback EIPs:
> 0x00007bb4
> 0x00007c8e
> 0x000057f9
> 0x00017cc6
> 0x0000161b
> 0x00005278
> #########################
>
> We can see that behavior of uclock_t is not long-long-behavior.
>
> Any explanation?
I can suggest two possible explanations:
- the C++ library has a bug when printing long long variables via
cout (did you try an equivalent C program?);
- uclock tries to reprogram the system timer chip, but Windows 2000,
being of the NT family, doesn't let you do so.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |