X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Manni Heumann <manni DOT heumann AT gmx DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DOS + djgpp on today's PCs
Date:	9 Apr 2002 17:10:50 GMT
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<a8v7aq$velrd$1@ID-54749.news.dfncis.de>
References:	<20020409163158 DOT GB19856 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp164-143.uni-bielefeld.de (129.70.164.143)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	fu-berlin.de 1018372250 32986989 129.70.164.143 (16 1428 [54749])
User-Agent:	Xnews/L5
X-Face:	"c)Go+A65AgR*9'!B)BMLM$kYg6HDG!_g'DAsj*ALo%=kp{X&abs&t\G0F~*r?VRj#|4=6)M.RJPnD]Ql:B<-7A^EAYFpDpZRMoJy?80^3B3b AT DXb%MTyOD.*4wu&Xt6o*+6`r5E
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

JT Williams wrote:

> I have never tried to install and use DOS on any post-486
> PC.  Is it still possible these days to use plain DOS and
> djgpp (no Windoze) on today's PCs?  IOW, could I buy a
> notebook PC, eradicate the M$ infestation, install DOS 5 +
> djgpp and be happy?  Or is working through a Windoze DOS
> box the only option these days? 
> 
> TIA/jtw

You could always do it, sure. But would you want to do it?
I guess DOS would be slower (no DMA), and power saving in DOS? 
But if it makes you happy, why not?

Manni

- Raw text -