delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: help with inline AT&T assembly |
Date: | Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:58:19 +0300 |
Lines: | 12 |
Message-ID: | <3CAAB61B.FC481AF4@is.elta.co.il> |
References: | <3CAA99CA DOT 33B1298D AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20020403025837 DOT 19509 DOT 00001308 AT mb-cm DOT aol DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 192.116.55.139 |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | fu-berlin.de 1017820949 29114836 192.116.55.139 (16 [61365]) |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Sterten wrote: > > and then I had several errors , I don't like the AT&T-syntax. Many people disagree with you (they don't like the Intel syntax). > Here is , what finally worked but gave only a speed improvement > of about 30% on my K6/2 : As a rule of thumb, you shouldn't expect any speedups more than 30-50% from going to assembly. If you need a larger speedup, you should rethink your algorithms.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |