Mail Archives: djgpp/2002/03/06/10:15:24
ooops.
ooops.
Dear Mr. Stromberg:
Our purpose is to get an XSL processor ported to DOS (is this of any
interest to you??). Unfortunately, I wasn't aware that my posting would
constitute 'a new subject'. You see, I just posted the message where I
thought it made the most sense (next to the first message about 'version
info'. Besides, this thread was started to run off my screen.
I deeply apologize for any inconvienience that this may have caused you.
Thanks for the tip about uninstalling. It was of practicle value for me.
NOW:
Problem solved (not bacuse I didn't uninstall correctly, though - my
compiler was fine)!!! We have a DOS port of libxslt.a - and xsltproc.exe is
up and running :-)
The real problem was THIS:
You remember that the makefile was always trying to execute
D:\\USER\\DJGPP\\BIN\\GCC.EXE
This was caused by a SYSTEM VARIABLE that I had set up:
SET CC=D:\USER\DJGPP\BIN\GCC.EXE
I did this because I read once in one applications README that it might be
needed (Allegro maybe, can't remember..)
DON'T DO THIS. If it really is neccessary, have GCC.EXE in the path and do
THIS:
SET CC=GCC.EXE
Symptom of this error: make tries to execute gcc through a path that
contains '\\'.
Nobody heard of it?? Sorry. New one for prosterity.
Listen, guys, for anyone who wants it (the binaries), just send me a message
in the next few days and I'll make a list... I'll send it out Monday so that
I only need to e-mail once...
The file is kinda' big... (1.7 meg big... libxslt.a is another 1.03m - I'll
zip 'em)
By the way, Mr. Sandmann...
the makefile did still try to build 'shared libraries' even though I saw
this line as the configure script was running:
"checking if libtool supports shared libraries... no"
???
But that wasn't what was causing the crash ... DJGPP just sends a warning
and keeps going with the make.
Thanks again for the help.
Ben
"Martin Stromberg" <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> wrote in message
news:a654h0$7sh$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se...
> First, can you please stop making new subjects all the time if you're
> talking about the same thing?
>
> deckerben (deckerben AT freenet DOT de) wrote:
> : My actual autoconf version is 2.13. I was told not to use 2.5, so I
> : installed 2.13 overtop of it. This is just so you guys have a better
look at
>
> No-no-no-no-no. First you uninstall the other package and then install
> the new one. That's what you should do first and then come back if you
> still has problems.
>
> How you uninstall is in the FAQ.
>
>
> Right,
>
> MartinS
- Raw text -