X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	"Thomas Mueller" <tmueller AT bluegrass DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: WinXP and DJGPP....
Date:	22 Feb 2002 10:49:24 GMT
Lines:	24
Message-ID:	<a557nj$4ok5c$4@ID-49635.news.dfncis.de>
References:	<639-Tue19Feb2002151400+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020218091105 DOT 1856L-100000 AT is> <3c708f3f DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <a4tehn$2umif$2 AT ID-49635 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dial3-113.bluegrass.net (208.147.34.113)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	fu-berlin.de 1014374964 5001388 208.147.34.113 (16 [49635])
X-Mailer:	NOS-BOX 2.05
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

From Eli Zaretskii:

>Yes, but I cannot have a UPS everywhere.  Besides, some of the power
>outages down here last for too long for the UPS to be a solution.

You can still shut down gracefully and prevent damage to the file system.  But
a UPS can't keep a system going under all possible scenarios.

>A machine that can stay up for 3 months can do that for a year as
>well.

Maybe, sometimes, if your luck holds out.  I don't think I ever made 3 months
steady ontime with OS/2.  GCC port to OS/2 is EMX, so an OS/2 user might be
more motivated to run EMX than DJGPP.

>I use Emacs to read my mail, so what is done with attachments is
>under my full control.  There are some types of virus out there whome
>I got to recognize by their MIME headers ;-)

I too sometimes recognize the virus, and even if I don't recognize the virus's
identity, I recognize it as looking suspicious.  Emacs, or elvis too, offers
much better control than you get with the typical MS-Windows mail and news
clients.

- Raw text -