X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre AT spamcop DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.lang.c
Subject:	Re: gcc 2.953 output - is this a bug?
Date:	Thu, 07 Feb 2002 21:15:42 +0000
Message-ID:	<qfr56u002hki36el2imocsk18v38gqmqdr@4ax.com>
References:	<3C61E6BB DOT 7F9AD526 AT yahoo DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	garthorn.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host:	garthorn.demon.co.uk:158.152.83.188
X-Trace:	news.demon.co.uk 1013116534 nnrp-07:25089 NO-IDENT garthorn.demon.co.uk:158.152.83.188
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT demon DOT net
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.9/32.560
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	25
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 07 Feb 2002 02:31:00 GMT, CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
wrote:

>Please look at the following disassembly:

I'm mystified as to why you thought this was topical in CLC .....

> 585:   8d 04 d2                lea    (%edx,%edx,8),%eax <<***
> 588:   8d 04 82                lea    (%edx,%eax,4),%eax <<***

if gcc created this, then its badly broken. My vax has no edx
register, nor does my mac, nor palmpilot, etc etc 

>c.l.c justification - purely standard source code :-)  I AM
>impressed by gcc's code generation.

great. I'm happy for you....

wasn't it only the other day someone complained that we're intolerant
of Win32 questions but tolerant of gcc ones? I wonder what they make
of a question about assembler.... !!

-- 
Mark McIntyre
CLC FAQ <http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html>

- Raw text -