delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
Date: | Sun, 27 Jan 2002 21:20:55 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <200201280220.g0S2Ktv26809@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <a328s8$14st13$2@ID-49635.news.dfncis.de> |
(tmueller AT bluegrass DOT net) | |
Subject: | Re: C or C++? |
References: | <a2l20p$qdv$1 AT rivage DOT news DOT be DOT easynet DOT net> <rYU38.1222$D6 DOT 3530 AT news DOT iol DOT ie> <3C508EA8 DOT 5045AD53 AT earthlink DOT net> <3C51A889 DOT 24461A22 AT pq DOT fta-berlin DOT NOSPAMPLEASE DOT de> <1659-Fri25Jan2002213209+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <a328s8$14st13$2 AT ID-49635 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> "Smart-a**" is not considered profane. It is by me. I don't want my children saying it. > But I meet some rough language in some other newsgroups, including > alt.os.linux.slackware. So? Do we have to be as bad as the bad examples, or should we be as good as the good examples? Or should we be a good example to others? I've always asked that this forum remain clean, helpful, and positive, and in general I've been quite pleased at how well people treat each other here. It gives a good name to the project and we've gotten lots of good press because of it. It takes a little effort, but not a lot of effort, and it certainly doesn't stop people from expressing themselves technically or stating a well-formed opinion. So please, keep up the good work!
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |