delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:43:40 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: GCC 3.03 makes slow code |
In-Reply-To: | <Xns91997A8DCC34Agd678bcz5bAA@192.89.123.233> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020117134010.14977H-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, no spam wrote: > So it looks like we have to stick with the GCC 2.9.x for good? If you don't need to compile complex C++ programs, there's no urgent reason to upgrade to GCC 3.x series, IMHO. OTOH, it's quite possible that by playing with the optimization switches, you will be able to get GCC 3.x to produce the same quality of code as 2.95.x. That's why I suggested top use -O2: -O3 is generally a bad idea.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |