Mail Archives: djgpp/2002/01/09/13:15:12.1
from Matej Cepl <ceplma00 AT yahoo DOT com>:
> After a little testing and huge conversation with Eli Zaretskii,
it was found, that vim has a bug with using NULL pointer. When
every mentioning of DPMI in CONFIG.SYS (be aware, that MULTI in
EMM386.EXE line means DPMI too) and AUTOEXEC.BAT, replacing
NWCACHE by SMARTDRV, and using CPWSDPMI -x -p (all this before
calling TASKMGR, of course), makes vim working even in TASKMGR.
> I shall immediately write to comp.editors about it.
> Thanks, Eli!
> Matej
Is this NULL pointer bug in vim 6 DOS-only, or does it affect vim in all OSes?
vim 6 I have, 32-bit version, seems quite stable as long as I only handle one
file at a time. I am not interested in 16-bit version because I need to handle
files that don't fit in low DOS memory. Text editors that only handle up to
maybe 370 KB are all too easy to come by for DOS.
In DR-DOS, unlike MS-DOS, you are not supposed to use HIMEM.SYS at all when you
use EMM386.EXE.
- Raw text -