Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:20:22 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Andrew Fairburn" <a DOT j DOT fairburn AT durham DOT ac DOT uk>
Message-Id:	<4634-Wed21Nov2001202021+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<9tge0v$7ne$1@sirius.dur.ac.uk> (a.j.fairburn@durham.ac.uk)
Subject:	Re: HELP - dpmi_allocate_real_mode_callback
References:	<9tge0v$7ne$1 AT sirius DOT dur DOT ac DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Andrew Fairburn" <a DOT j DOT fairburn AT durham DOT ac DOT uk>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:37:14 -0000
> 
> if(__dpmi_allocate_real_mode_callback( rcv, &r, &realret) == -1) exit(32);
> 
> rcv is the function trying to be called....
> 
> this return 0xfdbc for the segment address into the raddr struct......is teh
> function executing wrong?

What's wrong with 0xfdbc?  As long as you get a number less than
0xffff, you shouldn't suspect a trouble.

If your code crashes, it's possible that the reason for the crashes
is something else.  The DJGPP FAQ tells in section 12.2 how to begin
debugging your problem using the crash message printed by the program
when it dies.

- Raw text -