| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Nov 2001 13:38:03 -0500 |
| Message-Id: | <200111111838.fABIc3u21739@envy.delorie.com> |
| From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <5.1.0.14.2.20011112042008.00a4fec0@pop.softhome.net> (message |
| from Le Chat Noir on Mon, 12 Nov 2001 04:25:57 +1100) | |
| Subject: | Re: C++ replacement for cprintf(), etc? |
| References: | <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20011112042008 DOT 00a4fec0 AT pop DOT softhome DOT net> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> so, is there? Will an unbuffered cout do the trick? Or is there > more to console output than meets the eye/buffer? Thanks, cheers. No replacement is needed. Continue using cprintf() etc even in C++. They still exist and they are still the right functions for that purpose.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |