Mail Archives: djgpp/2001/11/07/05:19:34
Thanks for your welcomed email regarding the issues of
16 vs 32 bit; however this is precisely why I'm doing these
"benchmark" tests in the first place:
To See For Myself...and examine performance issues up close.
At this point, and I'm far from done, I am somewhat disappointed
with vc1.5x. I will continue to see what use I can put it to.
Like it or not, there are many uses for pure DOS environments,
and 16 / 32 bit compatibility should always be a consideration.
it's not just my opinion, it is simply good sense.
We now return you back to your channel of reality.
//RadSurfer//
On Mon, 05 Nov 2001 13:12:36 -0500, Radical NetSurfer wrote:
>I am now the very proud owner of Microsofts VC 1.52c,
>this is their LAST 16-bit MSDOS/WFW 3.11 compiler!
>
>I am going to be comparing its performance to our beloved
>DJGPP 2.95.3 installation.
>
>As well as comparing to Borlands.
>
>I will be most interested in seeing what the results are....
>
>To date, for the two programs I am testing between various
>compilers, DJGPP is absolutely the SPEEDIEST !!
>
>Results (output) are, of course, 100% equal between all compilers,
>except for their specific processing times.
>
>Stay tuned!
>
>MSVC 1.52c is available ONLY from MS, and ONLY registered
>users of MSVC & MSDN members are allowed to obtain this
>package. Don't ask me more about it, instead log into ms website
>and search there. Thanks.
>
>//RadSufer//
>
>email: radsmail AT juno DOT com
>http://members.tripod.com/~RadSurfer/
>
>Join us on Yahoo at:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BorlandCPPBuilder
>for informal discussions about all versions of Borland C/C++,
>especially C++Builder... Win9x, and Console32, also DJGPP.
>(you must be a Yahoo member to join)
- Raw text -