From:	"Traveler" <traveler AT netti DOT fi>
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Making C++ little easier to beginners...
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2001 03:53:34 +0300
Organization:	SAUNALAHDEN asiakas
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<9qntd3$k8s$1@tron.sci.fi>
References:	<9qmkrh$581$1 AT tron DOT sci DOT fi> <38315c2d DOT 0110181039 DOT 29608661 AT posting DOT google DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	cmlvi.rdyn.saunalahti.fi
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	tron.sci.fi 1003452643 20764 195.197.136.56 (19 Oct 2001 00:50:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	newsmaster AT saunalahti DOT fi
NNTP-Posting-Date:	19 Oct 2001 00:50:43 GMT
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id f9J101t15150
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> > if(x == 10 && x == 10)        // Does this look scary or weird 
> > to you ?
> 
> No. It looks like exactly you are ANDing the result of x == 10 with
> the result of x == 10. I suppose that's a bit weird, but certainly not
> scary.
I believe that you allready noticed the error...

> That's enough! How do you suppose obfuscating the C++ language behind
> a set of dodgy preprocessor macros makes things easier for anybody,
> particularly beginners? In fact, don't answer that.
You answer to this instead : If you make 'NAND' operation ('Not And') witch is more easier way to do it ?

Traditional or with the use of this stuff ?

Also note that what I have done so far is to offer alternative to "bit" and "logical" operations.
I did not try to do some brain-damage things like defining '{' with BEGING and '}' with END like in Pascal...

- Raw text -