delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:57:44 +0200 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Message-Id: | <3995-Tue16Oct2001175743+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
In-reply-to: | <3BCC49EC.5FB4D8ED@inti.gov.ar> (message from salvador on Tue, 16 |
Oct 2001 11:53:32 -0300) | |
Subject: | Re: MAKEing Turbo Vision 1.1.3 |
References: | <im4mstk71bb1ondv81goeqsededhsiqj0b AT 4ax DOT com> <3BCB274A DOT 34F2631 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <j0fnst84g4o75b64184kvs3dhlvg3j5gki AT 4ax DOT com> <3BCC49EC DOT 5FB4D8ED AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:53:32 -0300 > From: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> > > BTW: gcc 3.x is much more slower than previous versions and currently new > packages are linked with the new gettext so be prepared for slower > compilations and bigger files in the future. How much slower is GCC 3.x as compared to previous versions? I hear figures like 30% slower; do you have similar measurements? Also, I assume you mean that the compilation is slower, but not the produced code. Is that right? TIA
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |