From:	Radical DOT NetSurfer AT delorie DOT com
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Please add strrev proposal
Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:17:01 -0400
Organization:	Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID:	<bit9rt8qih41716vvs42gavjrfmc1v8kh2@4ax.com>
References:	<lcq8rtk1nqua2hc6rqfhmqisbd587n8t2n AT 4ax DOT com> <Xns912A8823C1399ASINANUNUR AT 132 DOT 236 DOT 56 DOT 8> <m1g9rtociqgunetpgm7qb5106m3sqvhpor AT 4ax DOT com> <Xns912AAABE1AF49ASINANUNUR AT 132 DOT 236 DOT 56 DOT 8>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	newsabuse AT supernews DOT com
Lines:	28
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 28 Sep 2001 20:47:07 GMT, "A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT cornell DOT edu> wrote:

>Radical NetSurfer wrote in
>news:m1g9rtociqgunetpgm7qb5106m3sqvhpor AT 4ax DOT com: 
>
>> in my humble opinion, its NONstandard that Libc doesn't already have
>> this.  Please name one other C/C++ compiler that also omits it?
>
>AFAIK, it is not in the ISO standard, and that makes it nonstandard.
>
>I also posted an example where your usage example contradicts how the code 
>actually works. (The same holds true with bcc if you use the strrev 
>function provided with it).

I've never had any problems with "bcc's" version of strrev(), odd or
even number of chars, 1-32 chars....
gosh...there have actually been days I could of used a memrev()
(where 0x00 could be included)

>My opinion does not matter that much, however.

Friendly discussion always matters.
(i.e. my frequent follow-up posts are meant to indicate I hope others
get involved with this discussion, so we can find out just what others
think...(hint hint))

>Sinan.

- Raw text -