Mail Archives: djgpp/2001/09/28/06:49:05
From: | Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Re: Where to report compiler bugs ?
|
Date: | 28 Sep 2001 10:41:49 GMT
|
Organization: | Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
|
Lines: | 27
|
Message-ID: | <9p1k5d$4ci$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
|
References: | <9p05eh$3r5$1 AT news DOT tpi DOT pl>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
|
X-Trace: | nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1001673709 4498 137.226.32.75 (28 Sep 2001 10:41:49 GMT)
|
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
|
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 28 Sep 2001 10:41:49 GMT
|
Originator: | broeker@
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
Raf256 <raf256 AT go2 DOT pl> wrote:
> I.e. very often some programmer-errors make *realy* strange error messages,
Please note: just because an error message is "strange" doesn't mean
that's a compiler bug. Especially in C++, where it's sometimes nearly
impossible to come up with a sensible guess at the actual cause for a
semantic error, so it's a bit overly optimistic to expect the compiler
to understand what you, an intelligent human being, apparently didn't.
The compiler can't know what you meant --- it's not a mindreader. So
it has to rely on what you actually typed.
> Can reports like this be repoted here ?
Can? Yes --- nobody can stop you from doing so. But generally, they
shouldn't. GCC-specific reports belong to GCC-specific forums.
> Or only DJGPP specific stuff ?
That's the idea, yes.
--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.
- Raw text -