From:	eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Possible bug in libc tmpnam() function
Date:	14 Sep 2001 11:17:09 GMT
Organization:	Ericsson Erisoft AB, Sweden
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<9nsovl$bvv$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se>
References:	<9nsm2c$q0f$1 AT news5 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk> <9nsmn6$2ai$1 AT news6 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	merope.lu.erisoft.se
X-Newsreader:	TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Ben Davis (ben AT vjpoole DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk) wrote:
: Hmm, now I don't know what to think. fopen(outfile, "wt") had the same
: effect - errno was set to ENOENT. Is this correct behaviour then?

: > the file, since tmpnam() does not overwrite existing files. However, it is
: > my understanding that errno should be preserved by all successful library
: > calls.

I seems your understanding is a misunderstanding. Just point us to the
paragraph or side in the C (standard) document that says that errno
should be left alone by successful library calls.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -