From:	invalid AT erehwon DOT invalid (Neo 1061)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: max payne 6634
Organization:	Geeks Anonymous
Message-ID:	<3b99740c.304472167@news.primus.ca>
References:	<j9uh7.51169$Qh2 DOT 371386 AT news11-gui DOT server DOT ntli DOT net> <3b869435 DOT 382070641 AT news DOT primus DOT ca> <9kvjot8qavhdpj617ehvv992fgudq8lr4c AT 4ax DOT com> <slrn9p6tq7 DOT 1cgo DOT marcov AT toad DOT stack DOT nl> <3b942d4c DOT 691266118 AT news DOT primus DOT ca> <slrn9p9d3k DOT jbg DOT marcov AT toad DOT stack DOT nl>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
Lines:	16
Date:	Sat, 08 Sep 2001 01:30:48 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	216.254.208.73
X-Complaints-To:	news AT primus DOT ca
X-Trace:	news1.tor.primus.ca 999912648 216.254.208.73 (Fri, 07 Sep 2001 21:30:48 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 07 Sep 2001 21:30:48 EDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 4 Sep 2001 10:59:19 GMT, marcov AT toad DOT stack DOT nl (Marco van de Voort)
sat on a tribble, which squeaked:

>I meant the entire msg itself. Not just the gibberish.

Yeah, but the entire message *was* gibberish. What's the point of
fooling anti-spam cancelbots if you're not going to get your
propaganda across? (Political propaganda, ad (i.e. corporate
propaganda), whatever.) The only way it makes sense is as a test, but
you might as well post an ad in the "test" -- if it fails, it would
have failed anyways, and if it succeeds, you just got advertising.
-- 
Bill Gates: "No computer will ever need more than 640K of RAM." -- 1980
"There's nobody getting rich writing software that I know of." -- 1980
"This antitrust thing will blow over." -- 1998
Combine neo, an underscore, and one thousand sixty-one to make my hotmail addy.

- Raw text -