delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Lines: | 26 |
X-Admin: | news AT aol DOT com |
From: | sterten AT aol DOT com (Sterten) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Date: | 05 Sep 2001 04:28:44 GMT |
Organization: | AOL http://www.aol.com |
Subject: | timing-routine |
Message-ID: | <20010905002844.18811.00004524@mb-fa.aol.com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
why do I sometimes get non-increasing number on consecutive runs of this routine ? Is there a better way to measure CPU-cycles ? #include "stdio.h" double timing() { long int i=0,j=0; double dd=0; __asm__ __volatile__ (" pushl %%eax pushl %%edx rdtsc movl %%eax,%0 movl %%edx,%1 popl %%edx popl %%eax ":"=g"(i),"=g"(j) ); dd=i*1.0+4294967296.0*j; return(dd);} int main(){ double d1=0; d1=timing(); printf("rdtsc=%lf\n",d1); return(0);}
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |