From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Problems with compilation
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2001 07:26:42 +0000 (UTC)
Organization:	University of Lulea, Sweden
Lines:	36
Message-ID:	<997774002.560704@queeg.ludd.luth.se>
References:	<200108140003 DOT UAA12330 AT delorie DOT com> <005601c12455$477bcb80$0200a8c0 AT lff> <001b01c1245f$81ea6600$0200a8c0 AT lff>
X-Trace:	news.luth.se 997774002 116 130.240.16.109 (14 Aug 2001 07:26:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT luth DOT se
User-Agent:	tin/pre-1.4-981225 ("Volcane") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m))
Cache-Post-Path:	queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se
X-Cache:	nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Luis Filipe Fabiani <luis2 AT becrev DOT com> wrote:
: oops...
: The files didn't post....
: The output is on the form  Iteration ; Number

: On the 11th iteration, the results begin to diverge...
: It's the same file, only compiled with diferent gcc's : Right - Linux;
: Wrong - DJGPP's gcc

: Here they are:
: Right            |  Wrong
: 0; 0.329133 | 0; 0.329133
: 1; 0.220333 | 1; 0.220333
: 2; 0.146741 | 2; 0.146741
: 3; 0.125026 | 3; 0.125026
: 4; 0.106024 | 4; 0.106024
: 5; 0.093153 | 5; 0.093153
: 6; 0.083088 | 6; 0.083088
: 7; 0.075116 | 7; 0.075116
: 8; 0.068662 | 8; 0.068662
: 9; 0.063431 | 9; 0.063431
: 10; 0.063296 | 10; 0.063296
: 11; 0.065674 | 11; 0.065673
: 12; 0.063461 | 12; 0.066310
: 13; 0.067236 | 13; 0.072322

First, do you use the same versions of gcc on both platforms?

Second, do you use the same switches to gcc?

Third, how do you deduce that one is right and the other is wrong?


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -