From:	pjfarley3 AT escape DOT com (Peter J. Farley III)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Which info/bfd.i* should be kept?
Message-ID:	<3b676c49.11154003@news.escape.com>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines:	14
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2001 21:43:50 CDT
Organization:	Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
X-Trace:	sv3-MvI7zjEgocGFMrmtTKXhvU4amYrYa90RZfd4vFi9+upmD7Jj3Mp4ulMR/JDeWoyYoFaFtUuG7putsQi!Bdsn7obhF4L8o5gbzFL5Wzk9hJIU4U/gEsNEoivz70N/a0pgeO4rJdUzcA/dfcoH
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT GigaNews DOT Com
X-DMCA-Notifications:	http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-Info:	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info:	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
Date:	Wed, 01 Aug 2001 02:48:34 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Both the binutils bfd library archive (bnu2112a.zip) and the gdb 5.00
binary archive (gdb500b.zip) have copies of info/bfd.i* files.  The
ones in binutils are newer (binutils are 6-26-01, gdb are 5-18-00),
but since I unpacked gdb500b.zip after unpacking bnu2112a.zip, I have
the earlier versions in my info directory.

Should I unpack bnu2112a.zip again to get the more current versions of
those files?

TIA for your advice.

----------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT nospam DOT dorsai DOT org OR
                     pjfarley3 AT nospam DOT escape DOT com)

- Raw text -