| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jul 2001 10:02:17 -0400 |
| Message-Id: | <200107311402.KAA16074@envy.delorie.com> |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f |
| From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010731164503.3973B-100000@is> (message from Eli |
| Zaretskii on Tue, 31 Jul 2001 16:47:03 +0300 (IDT)) | |
| Subject: | Re: ds==ss why? |
| References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010731164503 DOT 3973B-100000 AT is> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Strictly speaking, that's not true: CS and DS hold two different > selectors, but both these selectors point to segment descriptors > which describe the same memory region. GCC doesn't put jump tables, constants, or strings in the text segment? If it does, it expects CS==DS as far as memory maps go. (obviously, the *values* of cs and ds differ, because one is a code selector and the other is a data selector).
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |