delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | gautier_niouzes AT hotmail DOT com (Gautier) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: DJGPP limitations ? |
Date: | 30 Jul 2001 06:33:19 -0700 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com/ |
Lines: | 14 |
Message-ID: | <17cd177c.0107300533.2e21a48a@posting.google.com> |
References: | <9k2ap3$6bu$1 AT info DOT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 194.40.39.50 |
X-Trace: | posting.google.com 996499999 30331 127.0.0.1 (30 Jul 2001 13:33:19 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | groups-support AT google DOT com |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 30 Jul 2001 13:33:19 GMT |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Rafal Maj (Raf256)" <raf256 AT go2 DOT pl> > I think that DJGPP is the best C++ compiler :-) but, is it good for making > large projects ? Will it be possible to compile such big projects like i.e. > total of 500,000 lines (about 1 instruction in 1 line) + 50,000 functions + > 1,000 classes and about 20 MB .EXE file ? I'm asking only for curiosity :-) I know of a commercial project which made about 20MB .EXEs, more than 500,000 lines compiled with GNAT/DOS (the GNU Ada95 plugged to DJGPP) spread in about 60 packages; now GNAT for Linux and Windows are used, but it is a detail. So don't be afraid... G.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |