From:	"Wojciech Galazka" <wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: can we eliminate dpmi ?
Date:	Sun, 29 Jul 2001 22:31:02 +0200
Organization:	NASK - www.nask.pl
Lines:	24
Message-ID:	<9k1ri6$9h7$1@pippin.nask.waw.pl>
References:	<20010726101002 DOT 32519 DOT qmail AT mailweb15 DOT rediffmail DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	wawhsb-234.dial.plusgsm.pl
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	pippin.nask.waw.pl 996438408 9767 212.2.99.234 (29 Jul 2001 20:26:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT nask DOT pl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 29 Jul 2001 20:26:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id QAB22327
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Nilesh Modi wrote in <20010726101002 DOT 32519 DOT qmail AT mailweb15 DOT rediffmail DOT com>...
>Hi,
>
>I am making an embedded router , i have already made a protected mode program in >assembly language program which receives and sends data packets in protected mode , 

Try to write your 'embedded router' first in plain C & DPMI ussing DJGPP.
Once you're done with this and the program works albeit slowly you can optimize some if its
parts rewriting them in assembly (gcc enables to write assembly in C code)

THe only problem I see is whether the 'enbedded' system yuo seem to write the router for
does support DPMI?

The opposite way may not work
BTW have you checked the LinuxRouter and other router focused projects on the web ?

- Raw text -