From:	"Michael Demanet" <michaeldemanet AT brutele DOT be>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: C99
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2001 01:05:24 +0200
Organization:	Brutele sc - 29, rue de Naples - B1050 Bruxelles - Belgium
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<9jq7mh$3lk$1@news.brutele.be>
References:	<9jpmj6$q70$1 AT news DOT brutele DOT be> <3405-Thu26Jul2001215555+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	212.68.246.62.brutele.be
X-Trace:	news.brutele.be 996188689 3764 212.68.246.62 (26 Jul 2001 23:04:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT brutele DOT be
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2001 23:04:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2013.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2013.1300
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> a écrit dans le message :
3405-Thu26Jul2001215555+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il...
> > From: "Michael Demanet" <michaeldemanet AT brutele DOT be>
> > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> > Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 20:13:24 +0200
> >
> > Do you know if djgpp will support the new version of gcc (3.0) and when
?
>
> The preliminary port of GCC 3.0 is already available in the
> v2gnu/alphas directory.  It was announced here a few weeks ago.
>
> Note that GCC 3.0 and C99 are not the same thing.  C99 requires many
> changes in the standard headers and the library.  Those are developed
> by the DJGPP project itself (not by GCC maintainers), and we are not
> even close to supporting all of the C99 huge additions.

Thank you very much

--
------------
Break
http://homeusers.brutele.be/walkingtoadventure/

- Raw text -