From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be>
To:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, <tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be>
Cc:	<pjfarley3 AT escape DOT com>, <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Which config.site should be used, bash or autoconf 2.50?
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:10:11 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDICEMPCFAA.tim.vanholder@falconsoft.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
In-Reply-To:	<7263-Tue24Jul2001210234+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Importance:	Normal
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> So we should for now advise people to stay with config.site from Bash,
> unless they need to run only the scripts generated by the ported
> Autoconf.  Is that correct?

Yes.

- Raw text -