From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: memory under DOS
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2001 20:37:18 +0000 (UTC)
Organization:	University of Lulea, Sweden
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<995575038.867528@queeg.ludd.luth.se>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010717130411 DOT 29833A AT is> <20010717160543 DOT 05952 DOT 00000668 AT ng-ba1 DOT aol DOT com>
X-Trace:	news.luth.se 995575038 19566 130.240.16.109 (19 Jul 2001 20:37:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT luth DOT se
User-Agent:	tin/pre-1.4-981225 ("Volcane") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m))
Cache-Post-Path:	queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se
X-Cache:	nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Sterten <sterten AT aol DOT com> wrote:
:  >> But my GCC203 programs still seem to use only 64MB  under DOS.
:  >> While in a DOS window under WIN98 , they seem to make use of all
:  >> installed  RAM.

As stated this is a limitation of HIMEM.SYS. Either use a later
version or use FDXXMS from FDXMS 0.8 which will be released Real Soon
Now (tm) (<http://www.ludd.luth.se/~ams/freedos/>).

: now I discovered go32-v2.exe , but it doesn't report more RAM than DOS.
: There should be a way around this. Why can't cwsdpmi  overwrite
: the (wrong) DOS memory table  and use all RAM ?

I think it can as long as you don't use any HIMEM.SYS...


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -