Message-ID:	<3B5633D2.2090405@operamail.com>
From:	Sahab Yazdani <sahaby AT operamail DOT com>
Organization:	PheonixSoft Interactive
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.2+) Gecko/20010716
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Why?
References:	<20010717143916 DOT 30436 DOT qmail AT web14608 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Cache-Post-Path:	nomad.vif.com!unknown AT ip216-239-69-166 DOT vif DOT net
X-Cache:	nntpcache 2.4.0b4 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Lines:	15
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2001 20:11:38 CDT
X-Trace:	sv3-WnrxTTsDB4x0P5LtDe04g9qo4fGe1LT5PmdIoEs8CUK0Pox0/9seZbo330IN+t6tWfneS2qt5iJ5hbo!BsSj1QDUgDLe9+nP50QQ9uxJHL69A1NS4j/ku+Lczq7/GXn+GNiZq5zFEzOOaig=
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT GigaNews DOT Com
X-DMCA-Notifications:	http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-Info:	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info:	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2001 21:11:46 -0400
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Anton Andreev wrote:
 >[sniped] - general area of discussion: Borland C compiles faster than GCC.

maybe, but the code that GCC produces is *soo* much faster than the one 
Borland creates.  it is worth the extra time IMO.  and also GCC complies 
with more of the C/C++ standards than Borland if i remember correctly.

-- 
*********************************************************
* Sahab Yazdani * "Reality is irrelevent, perception is *
* Thornhill S.S * everything." - Zeddicus Zu'l Zorander *
*********************************************************
* http://pheonixsoft.virtualave.net/                    *
*********************************************************

- Raw text -