Message-ID:	<3B487D65.85F67139@postmark.net>
From:	Jason Hood <adoxa AT postmark DOT net>
Organization:	NiteRider
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en,pdf
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Sort temp file bug?
References:	<3B449BBF DOT 8EA89B2A AT postmark DOT net> <7458-Thu05Jul2001211407+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host:	202.7.180.38
X-Original-Trace:	9 Jul 2001 01:52:50 +1000, 202.7.180.38
Lines:	20
Date:	Mon, 09 Jul 2001 01:33:57 +1000
NNTP-Posting-Host:	203.12.160.33
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT telstra DOT net
X-Trace:	nsw.nnrp.telstra.net 994606442 203.12.160.33 (Mon, 09 Jul 2001 01:34:02 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 09 Jul 2001 01:34:02 EST
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > From: Jason Hood <adoxa AT postmark DOT net>
> 
> I don't understand: what does ``looking at the binary'' mean?  How do
> you look at the binary and see what temporary files will it produce?

I saw "sort%5d%5d" and "s%5d%2d.%3d" and made the logical conclusion.
 
> What is the size and time stamp of sort.exe you are using?  I remember
> some bug around those lines in some uploaded binary distro, but I
> think it was later corrected.

Okay, I just checked Simtel.Net and my txt20b is a month behind. I just
tested it with LFN=n and that worked okay, but DOS will wait. I expect
it will work. Sigh. None out of three. :)

Jason.

- Raw text -