From:	Cesar Rabak <csrabak AT uol DOT com DOT br>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Thanks for statfs() rev. 1.6!
Date:	Sat, 07 Jul 2001 14:10:07 -0300
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<3B47426F.FA2ED5FA@uol.com.br>
References:	<200107050333 DOT FAA14607 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3B4536ED DOT EAC586B2 AT alpha DOT delta DOT edu> <7458-Fri06Jul2001111507+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	200-221-14-196.dsl-sp.uol.com.br (200.221.14.196)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	fu-berlin.de 994525868 17723151 200.221.14.196 (16 [39218])
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	pt-BR,es,en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 23:56:29 -0400
> > From: "David Witbrodt" <dawitbro AT alpha DOT delta DOT edu>
> >
> >   Info source          Free bytes reported
> >   ===========          ===================
> >   C:->Properties       4 095 901 696 bytes
> >   Scandisk             4 095 901 696 bytes
> >
> >   statfs()             4 026 531 840 bytes
> >
> >   The discrepancy is 69 369 856 bytes, and I don't claim to have a
> > clue as to which figure is correct.
> 
> What's the size of the Windows swap file (assuming it is on that
> partition)?
> 
> Also, does ScanDisk say anything about bad blocks?

Adding to Eli's questions, how much space is being used for the "recycle
bin"?

- Raw text -