Date:	Fri, 06 Jul 2001 11:15:07 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"David Witbrodt" <dawitbro AT alpha DOT delta DOT edu>
Message-Id:	<7458-Fri06Jul2001111507+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3B4536ED.EAC586B2@alpha.delta.edu> (dawitbro@alpha.delta.edu)
Subject:	Re: Thanks for statfs() rev. 1.6!
References:	<200107050333 DOT FAA14607 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3B4536ED DOT EAC586B2 AT alpha DOT delta DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 23:56:29 -0400
> From: "David Witbrodt" <dawitbro AT alpha DOT delta DOT edu>
> 
>   Info source          Free bytes reported
>   ===========          ===================
>   C:->Properties       4 095 901 696 bytes
>   Scandisk             4 095 901 696 bytes
> 
>   statfs()             4 026 531 840 bytes
> 
>   The discrepancy is 69 369 856 bytes, and I don't claim to have a
> clue as to which figure is correct.

What's the size of the Windows swap file (assuming it is on that
partition)?

Also, does ScanDisk say anything about bad blocks?

- Raw text -