From:	"Jacek K." <xos AT o2 DOT pl>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Accessing registers from C
Date:	Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:23:56 +0200
Organization:	tp.internet - http://www.tpi.pl
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<9i2m71$qlf$1@news.tpi.pl>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010704095943 DOT 3231S-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pe27.gdansk.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
X-Trace:	news.tpi.pl 994368545 27311 213.76.28.27 (5 Jul 2001 21:29:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT tpi DOT pl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	5 Jul 2001 21:29:05 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Priority:	3
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> To call a procedure via a call gate, you will probably need either
> inline assembly or an assembly wrapper anyway, right?  So why did you
> specifically said you want something that isn't inline assembly?

Because I don't want. Unfortunately gcc is very limited. If there was
something like this:

__attribute__ ((("far")))
  and
__attribute__ ((("interrupt")))          // for intel processors

I wouldn't have a problem.

Jacek

- Raw text -