delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:33:38 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <200106050033.UAA29487@envy.delorie.com> |
X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
CC: | awhite AT mail DOT rosecom DOT ca |
In-reply-to: | <3B1C2662.A2575F0D@mail.rosecom.ca> (message from April on Mon, |
04 Jun 2001 20:22:58 -0400) | |
Subject: | Re: gprof question |
References: | <3B1C2662 DOT A2575F0D AT mail DOT rosecom DOT ca> |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> I realize that this is a very ambiguous question, but what generally > causes these interrupts to fire? The program runs for about 50 seconds, > and more than 30 seconds apparently are taken up by calls to this > interrupt. If I can acertain what causes it to fire, I might be able to > alter my code and reduce this significant overhead - I hope :-) Anything that does an OS call - read, time, sbrk (used by malloc), sometimes getkey().
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |