| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Wed, 30 May 2001 20:45:08 +0300 |
| From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
| To: | "Jack K." <xos AT o2 DOT pl> |
| Message-Id: | <7263-Wed30May2001204508+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
| X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
| CC: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <9f2fkb$fup$1@news.tpi.pl> (xos@o2.pl) |
| Subject: | Re: Returning from procedure |
| References: | <9f2fkb$fup$1 AT news DOT tpi DOT pl> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: "Jack K." <xos AT o2 DOT pl> > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:41:05 +0200 > > Can I force the compiler to generate "retf" or "iret" instead of "ret" at > the end of procedure? There's inline assembly, of course...
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |