delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-ID: | <000a01c0d8be$84a58600$f8089d3e@iron> |
From: | "Thomas Schachtner" <thomas DOT schachtner AT gmx DOT de> |
To: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Cc: | <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
References: | <9cp464$ju8$1 AT news2 DOT dtag DOT de> <9cp8nj$ap6$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <9cu780$5rr$1 AT news2 DOT dtag DOT de> <3028-Fri04May2001183719+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <000c01c0d56e$77a9a7e0$cb099d3e AT iron> <9003-Sat05May2001175837+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <001901c0d577$954622c0$cb099d3e AT iron> <1659-Sat05May2001211357+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <9d8src$9kc$1 AT news2 DOT dtag DOT de> <5137-Tue08May2001211326+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <9dbjel$35j$2 AT news2 DOT dtag DOT de> <5567-Wed09May2001200344+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Subject: | Re: read a specific memory address |
Date: | Wed, 9 May 2001 21:30:32 +0200 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
> > I checked the return values, but none of them failed... > > After modifying the program (making it smaller) the first DMI function > > fails - but only with Windows 2000.... > > What is that first function--is that __dpmi_physical_address_mapping? yes, it fails, but only on Windows 2000, and only after changing my program; in the original configuration it didn't fail.... > If that fails, you cannot continue. What can I do against this failure? > What are the values of dmi.start and dmi.length printed by this > snippet from your program: > > > mi.address = dmi.start; > > mi.size = dmi.length; > > > > printf ("mi.address = %08X\n", dmi.start); > > printf ("mi.size = %08X\n", dmi.length); > > > > if (__dpmi_physical_address_mapping (&mi) == -1) Sorry, I am already at home and do not know the values by heart, but dmi.start is 0x0BFF0000 and dmi.length is something like 0x0220 or 0x0520 ... And: Why does this function fail with Windows 2000 and does NOT fail with Windows Me?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |