Message-ID:	<3AEF39B6.3080305@operamail.com>
From:	Sahab Yazdani <sahaby AT operamail DOT com>
Organization:	PheonixSoft Interactive
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.8.1+) Gecko/20010501
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: Binutils 2.11 released
References:	<200104261711 DOT NAA00607 AT delorie DOT com> <9cdcdp$uqp$1 AT slb1 DOT atl DOT mindspring DOT net>
Lines:	33
Date:	Tue, 01 May 2001 18:33:26 -0400
NNTP-Posting-Host:	149.99.15.246
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT sprint DOT ca
X-Trace:	newscontent-01.sprint.ca 988756479 149.99.15.246 (Tue, 01 May 2001 18:34:39 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 01 May 2001 18:34:39 EDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Marp wrote:

> "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com> wrote in message
> news:200104261711 DOT NAA00607 AT delorie DOT com...
> 
>>The DJGPP port of Binutils 2.11 has been released.
>>
> 
> How did we go from version 2.7 to 2.9.5.1 to 2.10 to 2.11? Is someone using
> fuzzy math?


um... 10 and 11 are bigger than 7 and 9....   so this versioning makes 
perfect sense.  its just like the linux kernal.  it went 2.2.9, 2.2.10, etc.

besides  I think that the first two refer to the versions of GCC, 
whereas the second two refer to the versions of Binutils?


> 
> 
> 



-- 
**************************************************************
* Sahab Yazdani * Sometimes when we are labeled, when we are *
* Thornhill S.S * branded, our brand becomes our calling.    *
**************************************************************
* http://pheonixsoft.virtualave.net/                    * :) *
**************************************************************

- Raw text -