Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:01:58 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
Message-Id:	<3405-Mon30Apr2001210156+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20010430113529.A5691@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT Williams
	on Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:35:29 -0500)
Subject:	Re: __DJGPP__ and MSDOS
References:	<20010430093758 DOT A5379 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010430192119 DOT 19343D-100000 AT is> <20010430113529 DOT A5691 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:35:29 -0500
> From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
> 
>
> That might be true (depending on what version of GCC do you use), but
> even if it is so, the necessary header is included by the preprocessor
> before anything else, because the specs file tells it to do so with the
> -isystem switch.
> 
> I'm using gcc 2.7.2.1 with (recently installed) binutils 2.10; could
> this combination have introduced a subtle misfeature with respect to
> the specs file?

Not unless you messed it up on top of that ;-)

GCC 2.7.2.1 needs a specs file in the lib directory, and then it
defines both __MSDOS__ and __DJGPP__.  I use the above combination on
one of my machines, and it has yet to give me any trouble.

- Raw text -