delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <3.0.6.16.20010429114701.62afcf70@pop3.01019freenet.de> |
X-Sender: | nur DOT nurani AT pop3 DOT 01019freenet DOT de |
X-Mailer: | QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (16) |
Date: | Sun, 29 Apr 2001 11:47:01 -0200 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
From: | Nur Nurani <nur DOT nurani AT freenet DOT de> |
Subject: | Re: gcc for djgpp vs borland c compiler |
In-Reply-To: | <9cg46n$kk5$1@sunlight.pku.edu.cn> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Hi, there is an optimation switch -s (I think). Turn it on and you will get an exe under 40 kByte. Nur Danny has written at 12:01 29.04.2001 +0800 : > >Hi, THere. > >I have got both gcc for djgpp and borland C compiler (bcc32). I compared >them on a simple 'hello world' C code. I found gcc made a EXE with size of >107,516bytes, while bcc32 generated a EXE with size of 52,736bytes. > >How come they are so different? > >Thanks. > > >Dan > > > > > Thanks Nur -- Nur Nurani Alte Zoll Strasse 17 77694 Kehl am Rhein
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |