Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:23:56 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Wojciech Galazka" <wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl>
Message-Id:	<2427-Wed25Apr2001202355+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<9c6spm$mc5$1@pippin.nask.waw.pl>
	(wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl)
Subject:	Re: Eradicating djgpp W2000 problem
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010425091523 DOT 22758G AT is> <9c6spm$mc5$1 AT pippin DOT nask DOT waw DOT pl>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Wojciech Galazka" <wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 18:07:13 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> > wrote
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, John Lee wrote:
> >
> > I think we may be on our way to finding a work-around.  Someone has
> > debugged NTVDM and provided a description of the bug which seems to
> > allow an easy cure in the DJGPP library.  The solution was not tested
> > yet.  Stay tuned.
> 
> Where could I find the details ?

I'd prefer to wait until the details are indeed unambiguously clear,
before publishing them here.

- Raw text -