Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:31:55 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Waldemar Schultz <schultzma AT ma DOT tum DOT de>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: MINGW vs DJGPP
In-Reply-To:	<3ADD8755.71826091@ma.tum.de>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010418173114.29608B@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Waldemar Schultz wrote:

> sorry for replying to my own post.
> I used gcc 2.95.3(20010315) and got these confusing results:
> 
> Compiler           switch          reported size of struct vp
> djgpp gcc 2.95.2   -fpack-struct   80 eighty
> djgpp gcc 2.95.3   -fpack-struct   79 seventynine
> mingw gcc 2.95.2   -fpack-struct   79 seventynine
> djgpp gcc 2.95.2                   80 eighty
> djgpp gcc 2.95.3                   80 eighty
> mingw gcc 2.95.2                   88 eightyeight
> 
> when manually added, the sum of the sizes of the struct members is _79_

So it looks like -fpack-struct does work, at least in 2.95.3.

- Raw text -