From:	"Doug" <deleveld AT dds DOT nl>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: which is more efficient?
Date:	16 Apr 2001 14:49:27 GMT
Organization:	none
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<01c0c685$eedbb4e0$a6247d81@doug>
References:	<6LrC6.86$3r6 DOT 56986 AT sapphire DOT mtt DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	client36-166.oprit.rug.nl
X-Trace:	info.service.rug.nl 987432567 9793 129.125.36.166 (16 Apr 2001 14:49:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	newsmaster AT rug DOT nl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	16 Apr 2001 14:49:27 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Jason <jstewart1 AT ns DOT sympatico DOT ca> schreef in artikel
<6LrC6.86$3r6 DOT 56986 AT sapphire DOT mtt DOT net>...
> Can anyone explain which of these array of strings is more efficient? and
> Why?
> 
> 
> char * cities Ptr [3] = { "Sydney" , "Turo" , "Halifax" };
> 
> or
> 
> char * cities [3][2] = { "Sydney " , "Turo" , "Halifax" };

I don't get it.  What does the 2 mean? 

DOug

- Raw text -