Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
From:	fred smith <fredex AT fcshome DOT stoneham DOT ma DOT us>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin and MinGW32 which is better
User-Agent:	tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.16-3 (i586))
Sender:	fredex AT fcshome DOT stoneham DOT ma DOT us
Organization:	None!
Message-ID:	<GBrEIz.40B@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
References:	<02d201c0c3b9$d1f2a4c0$06e210a3 AT vampyr493ps7yo>
Date:	Sat, 14 Apr 2001 01:52:11 GMT
Lines:	24
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

VAMPYR <vampyr AT ms1 DOT url DOT com DOT tw> wrote:
: Cygwin and MinGW32 which is better? May you say the reason?

They're different kinds of animal,... how can one be better than the other?

MinGW32 is a compilation environment for Windoze.

Cygwin is a fairly complete unix-like environment for Windoze, which 
comes with but is not limited to a compilation environment.

I've not used either of the much, but have played with cygwin a little,
and it even seems to support background processes. I've compiled a couple
of Unix packages, including ncurses, on cygwin and it went quite nicely.

OTOH if all you want to do is build Windoze programs, MinGW32 may do
for you.


-- 
---- Fred Smith -- fredex AT fcshome DOT stoneham DOT ma DOT us ----------------------------
               But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: 
                         While we were still sinners, 
                              Christ died for us.
------------------------------- Romans 5:8 (niv) ------------------------------

- Raw text -