From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: which is more efficient?
Date:	Sun, 15 Apr 2001 21:35:21 -0400
Organization:	Global Crossing Telecommunications
Lines:	25
Sender:	UNKNOWN AT 209-130-219-144 DOT nas1 DOT roc DOT gblx DOT net
Message-ID:	<9bdi6a$j4i$1@node17.cwnet.frontiernet.net>
References:	<6LrC6.86$3r6 DOT 56986 AT sapphire DOT mtt DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	209-130-219-144.nas1.roc.gblx.net
X-Trace:	node17.cwnet.frontiernet.net 987384842 19602 209.130.219.144 (16 Apr 2001 01:34:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT frontiernet DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	16 Apr 2001 01:34:02 GMT
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Jason" <jstewart1 AT ns DOT sympatico DOT ca> wrote in message
news:6LrC6.86$3r6 DOT 56986 AT sapphire DOT mtt DOT net...
> Can anyone explain which of these array of strings is more efficient? and
> Why?
>
>
> char * cities Ptr [3] = { "Sydney" , "Turo" , "Halifax" };
>
> or
>
> char * cities [3][2] = { "Sydney " , "Turo" , "Halifax" };

what is your criteria of efficiency?
btw, the two don't do same thing, do they?

Good Luck
--
Alexei A. Frounze
alexfru [AT] chat [DOT] ru
http://alexfru.chat.ru
http://members.xoom.com/alexfru/
http://welcome.to/pmode/

- Raw text -