Date:	Sat, 14 Apr 2001 10:35:38 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Groman" <groman AT f2s DOT com>
Message-Id:	<2110-Sat14Apr2001103538+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<9b7svb$1o8$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> (groman@f2s.com)
Subject:	Re: Freaky upgrade results...
References:	<9b7svb$1o8$1 AT slb6 DOT atl DOT mindspring DOT net>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Groman" <groman AT f2s DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:00:37 -0700
> 
> embed.sys:
>  $(CPP) $(CPPFLAGS) -o kernel.o kernel.cpp
>  $(LD) $(LDFLAGS) kernel.o
> ---- ERROR MESSAGE ---
> ld-elf -static -o bin/kernel.sys -Ttext 0x100000 -v loader.o kernel.o
> lowlevel.o textscr.o
> GNU ld version 2.9 (with BFD 2.9)
> c:/groman/djgpp/bin/ld-elf.exe: kernel.o: Unrecognized storage class 127 for
> .text symbol `_cli__Fv'
> 
> -----------------
> 
> What the heck? I don't even know what the heck that means. (I have
> binutils-elf 2.9, and the latest DJGPP zips)

It probably means that the latest GCC and/or assembler emit code that
ld-elf.exe doesn't support.  Since the current Binutils version is
2.10, it's quite possible that 2.9-based linker could fail.

You could try using the -mno-bnu210 switch to the compiler (i.e., add
it to CFLAGS), perhaps it will help (assuming your GCC is 2.95.3).

- Raw text -