Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:49:50 +0200 (WET)
From:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To:	"Orlando P. Hevia" <heviaop AT ssdfe DOT com DOT ar>
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: g772953 and djdev203
In-Reply-To:	<200104011329.JAA09483@pop3.lc-2.la.inter.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.A41.4.05.10104020814040.61050-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

At first it's much more usefull to send it to DJGPP mailing list than to
me only. So I sending response also there.

Hint: 

try profiling Your application (compile and link Your application
using command line optioon -pg, after running Your application use gprof)
and compare results You're getting with djdev202 and djdev203. So
You'll may be able to identify stuff that eats extra time

Andris


On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Orlando P. Hevia wrote:

> Mr. Pavenis:
> 
> I am using g77 (and gcc) for the big Electro Magnetic 
> Transients Program (near 200000 lines).
> 
> I updated g772952 to g772953 (and gcc), with an increase of 
> run speed of near 1%, when I use djdev202. The increase is 
> small, of course, but it is persistent form run to run.
> 
> When I updated to djdev203, the speed decreased in near 
> 15%. It is a surprising result for me.
> 
> Of course, I will continue using djdev202.
> 
> I send this message because it may be of interest to you. 
> 
> Sorry by your time.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> OPH. 2001-4-1 10:30
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ing. Orlando P. Hevia   
> heviaop AT ssdfe DOT com DOT ar
> Santa Fe-Argentina
> 

- Raw text -