| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:07:15 -0500 |
| Message-Id: | <200103170107.UAA09188@envy.delorie.com> |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f |
| From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <3ab2b577.347408@news.redshift.com> (damon@WRONG.redshift.com) |
| Subject: | Re: DJGPP memory allocation algorithm? |
| References: | <3ab2b577 DOT 347408 AT news DOT redshift DOT com> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Before I go into the specifics of what the error is, can I ask the > DJGPP gurus if there's an internal limitation on the _number_ of > allocations one can do? Nope. It's limited by available virtual memory and the efficiency of the allocator (it rounds up allocation sizes) > I'm allocating about 50 bytes 17,000-odd times over. Would this > cause a problem in the allocation code? Should be efficient; round up to 64 byte chunks = about a megabyte.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |